shades logo

shades fills you in

the new yorker: the 2023 economy is *weird*. there’s disagreement among economists over how much inflation is falling, and the labor market is still tight despite high-interest rates
a soft landing in 2023?
new yorker
the new yorker: the 2023 economy is *weird*. there’s disagreement among economists over how much inflation is falling, and the labor market is still tight despite high-interest rates
fortune
a fortune op is optimisic: in early 2023, job openings fell, the unemployment rate fell, and inflation eased. the fed may be capable of a “soft landing” -- reining in inflation without a recession
barrons
a barrons op was also encouraged: 2023’s higher unemployment rate and slight hiring slowdown could signal that the fed’s interest rates are having their desired effect
bloomberg
but princeton economist alan blinder -- who used to be optimistic for a soft landing -- now says it won’t be easy to pull off. inflation just didn’t slow as much as we thought in 2022
national review
national review agrees. strong jobs numbers are a bad sign. before past recessions, the job market actually grew. we could see an inflationary recession
bloomberg
a bloomberg op: if the fed wants a soft landing, it’s going to have to ditch its 2% inflation target. it’s just not going to be possible to avoid a recession if they want to slow things down that much
bloomberg
a diff bloomberg op: how about no soft landing?? a soft landing would drag inflation on. that’s bad for households, businesses, and the fed’s credibility. let’s rip off that bandaid!
wsj
the wsj interviewed an economist who sort of agreed: thanks to a strong labor market and wage growth, we’ll probably still be struggling with inflation for a while. listen to the interview here
fortune
fortune wrote that the collapse of silicon valley bank and its aftermath have raised the probability of a recession: the fed will have to consider how higher interest rates could affect bank instability
national review
national review wrote off a soft landing entirely: the fed took too long to raise rates. banks are collapsing and interest rates are still high
cnbc
then on march 22, the fed raised interest rates by a quarter percentage point, and signaled rate hikes may be coming to an end
wapo
by the way, and as a little background, “the fed” means the federal reserve. it’s the u.s. central bank, and it tries to manage inflation and growth by setting interest rates -- wapo
up next...
fed overshoot?
fed overshoot?
stagflation.
stagflation.
the fed’s .25% hike.
the fed’s .25% hike.
inflation, a primer.
inflation, a primer.
robinhood’s future.
robinhood’s future.
are higher wages bad?
are higher wages bad?
the labor crunch.
the labor crunch.
stock market scaries.
stock market scaries.
baby formula crisis.
baby formula crisis.
buy now, pay later.
buy now, pay later.
federal unemployment checks.
federal unemployment checks.
is gen z. . . practical?
is gen z. . . practical?
biden’s china trade strategy.
biden’s china trade strategy.
the uk collapse, here?
the uk collapse, here?
weed glut.
weed glut.
shades logo